>From: Ben Hoyt >> PyBench2.0 shows the total running time dropping from 5653ms to 4571ms. > > That's very cool -- a significant improvement. Is this the kind of change that could go into 2.7.6 binaries? > > As a Windows user, it makes me wonder if compiling with the latest version of the Microsoft compiler > would improve things similarly? I'd expect to see some improvement, based solely on the bugs fixed recently by the optimizer team. No idea how much, but I know that Martin builds with PGO, and that's also been improved recently. > (Though updating project files to that is almost certainly a bigger project than the gcc update.) No idea what the gcc update involved, but this is only accurate if it took less than two minutes :-) I've upgraded the CPython projects before and everything worked fine. Steve
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4