2013/7/7 Charles-François Natali <cf.natali at gmail.com>: > Well, it complicates the signature and implementation. > If we go the same way, why stop there and not expose O_DSYNC, O_SYNC, > O_DIRECT... I added this counter-argument to the PEP. > If you want precise control over the open() sementics, os.open() is > the way to go (that's also the rationale behind io.open() opener > argument, see http://bugs.python.org/issue12105) Right. Victor
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4