RetroSearch Browse

Tue Jul 16 23:46:34 CEST 2013 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-July/127390.html

On 7/16/2013 9:39 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 23:19:21 +1000, Steven D'Aprano <steve at pearwood.info> wrote:

>> For example, pkgutil includes classes with single-underscore methods, which I take as private. It also has a function simplegeneric, which is undocumented and not listed in __all__. In in the absence of even a comment saying "Don't use this", I take it as an oversight, not policy that simplegeneric is private.
>
> I think you'd be wrong about that, though.  simplegeneric should really be
> treated as private.  I'm speaking here not about the general principle of
> the thing, but about my understanding of simplegeneric's specific history.

I think Steven (valid) point is "Why not, then, say it is internal 
either in docs or name?"-- which in this case would be in the docs.

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-July/127390.html below:

[Python-Dev] Tweaking PEP 8 guidelines for use of leading underscores