On 13 Jul 2013, at 07:41, Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote: > On 7/13/2013 12:10 AM, Eric Snow wrote: >> >> On Feb 27, 2013 4:31 AM, "Michael Foord" <fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk > >> > +1 PLY is capable and well tried-and-tested. We used it in Resolver >> One to implement a pretty large grammar and it is (in my opinion) best >> of breed in the Python parser generator world. Being stable and widely >> used, with an "available maintainer", makes it an ideal candidate for >> standard library inclusion. >> >> Is this still on the table? > > Who is the maintainer and what is his opinion? The maintainer is David Beazley and as far as I recall he has not expressed an opinion on this particular question. It would obviously need his agreement (and maintenance commitment) if it is to fly. Michael > > -- > Terry Jan Reedy > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/fuzzyman%40voidspace.org.uk -- http://www.voidspace.org.uk/ May you do good and not evil May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others May you share freely, never taking more than you give. -- the sqlite blessing http://www.sqlite.org/different.html
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4