RetroSearch Browse

Sat Jul 13 06:57:20 CEST 2013 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-July/127278.html

David Beasley; see earlier in this same thread:

http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-February/thread.html#124389

On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 9:41 PM, Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote:

> On 7/13/2013 12:10 AM, Eric Snow wrote:
>
>>
>> On Feb 27, 2013 4:31 AM, "Michael Foord" <fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk
>>
>
>   > +1 PLY is capable and well tried-and-tested. We used it in Resolver
>> One to implement a pretty large grammar and it is (in my opinion) best
>> of breed in the Python parser generator world. Being stable and widely
>> used, with an "available maintainer", makes it an ideal candidate for
>> standard library inclusion.
>>
>> Is this still on the table?
>>
>
> Who is the maintainer and what is his opinion?
>
> --
> Terry Jan Reedy
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/**mailman/listinfo/python-dev<http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev>
> Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/**mailman/options/python-dev/**
> jdunck%40gmail.com<http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/jdunck%40gmail.com>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20130712/d11124c0/attachment-0001.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-July/127278.html below:

[Python-Dev] PLY in stdlib (was cffi in stdlib)