RetroSearch Browse

Sat Jul 13 06:41:10 CEST 2013 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-July/127277.html

On 7/13/2013 12:10 AM, Eric Snow wrote:
>
> On Feb 27, 2013 4:31 AM, "Michael Foord" <fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk

>  > +1 PLY is capable and well tried-and-tested. We used it in Resolver
> One to implement a pretty large grammar and it is (in my opinion) best
> of breed in the Python parser generator world. Being stable and widely
> used, with an "available maintainer", makes it an ideal candidate for
> standard library inclusion.
>
> Is this still on the table?

Who is the maintainer and what is his opinion?

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-July/127277.html below:

[Python-Dev] PLY in stdlib (was cffi in stdlib)