RetroSearch Browse

Fri Jul 5 09:10:39 CEST 2013 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-July/127198.html

On 7/4/2013 3:36 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Maybe the mistake is that the others aren't mentioned? Or perhaps
> everything before 3.4a1 should be dropped? I forget what kind of policy
> we have for this -- is it all changes in this branch or only changes
> unique to this branch?

It cannot be 'unique' because most bug fixes are not unique to any 
branch. News for 3.x should have all relevant changes to 3.x, and, I 
think, only those.

The question is whether the entries under 3.3.1rc1 in 3.4 News are 
changes unique to 3.3.1rc1 that should not be in News 3.4; changes to 
both 3.3 and 3.4 that are now listed twice, and should only be listed 
once; or changes to 3.4 that are now listed only under 3.3 but should 
instead be listed as 3.4 changes. I am not looking at the moment because 
is it 3am here.

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-July/127198.html below:

[Python-Dev] Oddity in MISC/News on default