RetroSearch Browse

Fri Jan 11 18:42:20 CET 2013 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-January/123601.html

Am 11.01.2013 18:19, schrieb Andrea Griffini:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Christian Heimes <christian at python.org> wrote:
>> It has more issues. Coverity has sent me some complains, see attachment.
> 
> The second complaint seems a false positive; if self->extra is null
> then children is set to 0 and following code is not executed.

Yes, Coverity's results have lots of false positives. On the other hand
it's able to detect hard to find resource leaks. You get used to the
false positives and learn to appreciate the good stuff. :)

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-January/123601.html below:

[Python-Dev] Daily reference leaks (aef7db0d3893): sum=287