> *Lots* of applications make use of POSIX semantics for fork() / exec(). This doesn't mean much. We're talking about inheritance of FDs > 2 upon exec, which is a very limited subset of "POSIX semantics for fork() / exec()". I personally think that there's been enough feedback to show that we should stick with the default POSIX behavior, however broken it is... > Can someone please point to a writeop of the security issues involved? I've posted sample codes earlier in this thread, but here's a writeup by Ulrich Drepper: http://udrepper.livejournal.com/20407.html
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4