A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-January/123462.html below:

[Python-Dev] More compact dictionaries with faster iteration

[Python-Dev] More compact dictionaries with faster iteration [Python-Dev] More compact dictionaries with faster iterationAntoine Pitrou solipsis at pitrou.net
Sat Jan 5 00:34:40 CET 2013
On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 12:22:27 +0200
Maciej Fijalkowski <fijall at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone.
> 
> Thanks raymond for writing down a pure python version ;-)
> 
> I did an initial port to RPython for experiments. The results (on
> large dicts only) are inconclusive - it's either a bit faster or a bit
> slower, depending what exactly you do. There is a possibility I messed
> something up too (there is a branch rdict-experiments in PyPy, in a
> very sorry state though).

But what about the memory consumption? This seems to be the main point
of Raymond's proposal.

Regards

Antoine.
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4