On Feb 28, 2013, at 7:23 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: > Le Thu, 28 Feb 2013 06:57:36 -0500, > Jesse Noller <jnoller at gmail.com> a écrit : >> >> On Feb 28, 2013, at 6:55 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> >> wrote: >> >>> Le Thu, 28 Feb 2013 06:48:24 -0500, >>> Jesse Noller <jnoller at gmail.com> a écrit : >>>>> >>>>> Perhaps it's an idea to have a python-legal mailing list for these >>>>> topics? >>>>> >>>>> I don't think it's fundamentally wrong to scrutinize licenses, >>>>> provided that the discussion stays civil and factual. >>>>> >>>>> IIRC Debian has such a list because people got annoyed with the >>>>> traffic on other lists. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Stefan Krah >>>> >>>> We have one: psf at python.org >>> >>> That's not exactly a public mailing-list. >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Antoine. >> >> Nope. But it's also where lawyers flock and these issues can rapidly >> be resolved. > > Really? I didn't know lawyers flocked at the PSF. It also doesn't > provide any public feedback for said "resolution", meaning it doesn't > help alleviate any future discussions about legal issues. > > Regards > > Antoine. > Yes sir. Ill have a new mailing list made today. I will note on the list page that is is strictly unofficial and all legal / lawyer type things must be sent to psf at python.org for official decisions or legal counsel. > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/jnoller%40gmail.com
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4