Le Thu, 28 Feb 2013 06:57:36 -0500, Jesse Noller <jnoller at gmail.com> a écrit : > > On Feb 28, 2013, at 6:55 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> > wrote: > > > Le Thu, 28 Feb 2013 06:48:24 -0500, > > Jesse Noller <jnoller at gmail.com> a écrit : > >>> > >>> Perhaps it's an idea to have a python-legal mailing list for these > >>> topics? > >>> > >>> I don't think it's fundamentally wrong to scrutinize licenses, > >>> provided that the discussion stays civil and factual. > >>> > >>> IIRC Debian has such a list because people got annoyed with the > >>> traffic on other lists. > >>> > >>> > >>> Stefan Krah > >> > >> We have one: psf at python.org > > > > That's not exactly a public mailing-list. > > > > Regards > > > > Antoine. > > > > Nope. But it's also where lawyers flock and these issues can rapidly > be resolved. Really? I didn't know lawyers flocked at the PSF. It also doesn't provide any public feedback for said "resolution", meaning it doesn't help alleviate any future discussions about legal issues. Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4