RetroSearch Browse

Thu Feb 28 12:42:59 CET 2013 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-February/124446.html

Jesse Noller <jnoller at gmail.com> wrote:
>       http://www.python.org/psf/contrib/contrib-form/ + http://opensource.org/
>     licenses/apache2.0.php
>        and why PSF doesn't comply the 4. Redistribution clause from Apache 2.0
>     license
> 
> 
> 
> I'm not even touching your security through obscurity trollbait, but I'd like
> to know how the PSF / Python core is non compliant with clause 4, and the legal
> counsel you spoke to to confirm this.

Perhaps it's an idea to have a python-legal mailing list for these topics?

I don't think it's fundamentally wrong to scrutinize licenses, provided
that the discussion stays civil and factual.

IIRC Debian has such a list because people got annoyed with the traffic
on other lists.

Stefan Krah

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-February/124446.html below:

[Python-Dev] Python Language Summit at PyCon: Agenda