RetroSearch Browse

Tue Feb 26 20:21:53 CET 2013 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-February/124367.html

On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 14:21:03 -0500
Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
> 
> > Generally speaking, deferring something to Python 4 means "never".
> >
> 
> Does that mean your aversion to double digit version numbers (i.e. 3.10) is
> gone or you expect to freeze Python in carbonite by then?

Or we'll go straight to 5.
(or switch to date-based numbering :-))

Regards

Antoine.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-February/124367.html below:

[Python-Dev] cffi in stdlib