On 26 February 2013 18:34, Maciej Fijalkowski <fijall at gmail.com> wrote: >> One point which I *think* is correct, but which I don't see noted >> anywhere. Am I right that cffi needs a C compiler involved in the >> process, at least somewhere? If that's the case, then it is not a >> suitable option for at least one use case that I have, writing quick >> hacks involving the Windows API on a machine that doesn't have a C >> compiler installed. Another possible case would be writing zip-safe >> code - if cffi involves a compiled C extension, it won't work when >> loaded from a zipfile. > > cffi does require a C compiler during either runtime or installation, > if you use the API. You can still use the ABI level, which is like > ctypes, only if you need the extra stuff, you need a C compiler. Cool, thanks. So if I use it like ctypes, cffi doesn't need a C compiler? That's nice, I never knew that. I definitely need to try it out. (So many projects, so little time... :-)) Paul
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4