On 02/26/2013 07:01 AM, Terry Reedy wrote: > On 2/25/2013 6:53 PM, Greg Ewing wrote: >> The currently suggested solution to that seems to be to >> make comparison non-transitive, so that Colors.green == 1 >> and Animals.bee == 1 but Colors.green != Animals.bee. >> And then hope that this does not create a quantum black >> hole that sucks us all into a logical singularity... > > But it will;-). > To repeat myself, transitivity of equality is basic to thought, logic, and sets and we should not deliver Python with it > broken. (The non-reflexivity of NAN is a different issue, but NANs are intentionally insane.) > > Decimal(0) == 0 == 0.0 != Decimal(0) != Fraction(0) == 0 > was a problem we finally fixed by making integer-valued decimals > compare equal to the same valued floats and fractions. In 3.3: > >>>> from decimal import Decimal as D >>>> from fractions import Fraction as F >>>> 0 == 0.0 == D(0) == F(0) > True > > http://bugs.python.org/issue4087 > http://bugs.python.org/issue4090 > explain the practical problems. We should NOT knowingly go down this road again. If color and animal are isolated from > each other, they should each be isolated from everything, including int. Thank you, Terry. -- ~Ethan~
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4