On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 12:30 AM, Stefan Krah <stefan at bytereef.org> wrote: > Larry Hastings <larry at hastings.org> wrote: > > http://bugs.python.org/issue16612 > > > > I'm guessing python-dev is the right place for the ten-thousand-foot view > > topics: the merits of the specific proposed DSL syntax, the possible > runtime > > extension API, and the approach as a whole. So for now let's just use > the bug > > tracker issue for code reviews and the like. > > For anyone who isn't following the issue: A PEP proposing a different DSL > will be forthcoming either this or next weekend. > If the two proposals share at least the motivation, would it not be more constructive to just have them listed as alternatives in a single PEP? This could serve as a useful single source of information for the new proposed features. Eli -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20130226/e741b53c/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4