Ethan Furman wrote: > I must admit I find it mildly amusing (but a lot frustrating) that we > are talk about /enumerations/ not needing to be based on ints. Checking > out Merrian-Webster gives this: > > Definition of ENUMERATE > 1 > : to ascertain the number of : count > 2 > : to specify one after another : list It depends on what you mean by "based on ints". Pascal enums are using the second definition here: the values have ints associated with them, but are not themselves ints. There are really two different use cases. Sometimes you want to have values that are directly substitutable for ints; other times you would rather not, so as to catch mistakes more easily. -- Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4