On 02/25/2013 10:49 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 09:03:06 -0800 > Eli Bendersky <eliben at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> "DOG" > "CAT" invokes lexicographical comparison between two strings, a >> well-defined and sensical operations. It simply means that in a sorted list >> of strings, "CAT" will come before "DOG". This is different from an >> enumeration that attempts to (at least logically) restrict a value to a set >> of pre-defined entities. > > No, it's not different. Like there are use cases for ordered > comparisons of strings, there are cases for ordered comparisons of > enums. > For example, if I have an enum representing SIP or HTTP response codes, > it is perfectly reasonable to write: > > if code < 200: > # temporary response > ... > elif code < 400: > # successful final response > ... > else: > # final error response: > ... > > Really, there's no justification for claiming an enum should never > compare to anything else. It's entirely application-dependent. +1
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4