On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 09:03:06 -0800 Eli Bendersky <eliben at gmail.com> wrote: > > "DOG" > "CAT" invokes lexicographical comparison between two strings, a > well-defined and sensical operations. It simply means that in a sorted list > of strings, "CAT" will come before "DOG". This is different from an > enumeration that attempts to (at least logically) restrict a value to a set > of pre-defined entities. No, it's not different. Like there are use cases for ordered comparisons of strings, there are cases for ordered comparisons of enums. For example, if I have an enum representing SIP or HTTP response codes, it is perfectly reasonable to write: if code < 200: # temporary response ... elif code < 400: # successful final response ... else: # final error response: ... Really, there's no justification for claiming an enum should never compare to anything else. It's entirely application-dependent. Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4