On 13.02.13 09:52, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Alexandre Vassalotti > <alexandre at peadrop.com> wrote: >> I don't think so. Ropes are really useful when you work with gigabytes of >> data, but unfortunately they don't make good general-purpose strings. >> Monolithic arrays are much more efficient and simple for the typical >> use-cases we have in Python. > > If I recall correctly, io.StringIO and io.BytesIO have been updated to > use ropes internally in 3.3. io.BytesIO has not yet. But it will be in 3.4 (issue #15381). On the other hand, there is a plan for rewriting StringIO to more effective continuous buffer implementation (issue #15612).
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4