RetroSearch Browse

Thu Dec 5 22:05:34 CET 2013 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-December/130692.html

On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
> Thanks for reporting this.

With pleasure! I'm just glad to have reported a valid bug for once in my
life :b

> This really belongs in the Python issue tracker (bugs.python.org) -- can
you submit a bug there?

I've opened issue # 19901 [1] as requested.

> My hunch is that, because this seems to be a relatively new feature, we
should just catch and ignore the exception from that specific call.

I agree, although I sort of phrased it poorly in the bug.

Thank you again for your support (and sorry for the delayed response).
Python is cool :]

[1]: http://bugs.python.org/issue19901
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20131205/1da17d8b/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-December/130692.html below:

[Python-Dev] test_bind_port and test_find_unused_port fail due to missing SO_REUSEPORT when building Python 3.3.2-r2 (from portage) on 3.7.10-gentoo-r1 kernel