Hello, On Fri, 30 Aug 2013 14:51:42 +0200 (CEST) eli.bendersky <python-checkins at python.org> wrote: > diff --git a/Doc/library/xml.etree.elementtree.rst b/Doc/library/xml.etree.elementtree.rst > --- a/Doc/library/xml.etree.elementtree.rst > +++ b/Doc/library/xml.etree.elementtree.rst > @@ -105,37 +105,42 @@ > >>> root[0][1].text > '2008' > > -Incremental parsing > -^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > +Pull API for asynchronous parsing > +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I think the documentation should use another term than "asynchronous": "non-blocking" or "event-driven" would be fine. "Asynchronous" is loaded with various meanings and connotations which IMO make it the wrong term here. For example, in many contexts "asynchronous" means "does the job behind your back, e.g. in a worker thread". POSIX defines some asynchronous I/O APIs which are ostensibly not the same as non-blocking I/O: http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/aio_read.html Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4