Le Fri, 30 Aug 2013 22:09:37 +1000, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> a écrit : > On 30 August 2013 20:27, Andrew Svetlov <andrew.svetlov at gmail.com> > wrote: > > I've filed http://bugs.python.org/issue18882 for this. > > I don't actually object to the addition, but is there any way that > "threading.enumerate()[0]" *won't* be the main thread? enumerate() doesn't guarantee any ordering, and the underlying container is a dict (actually, there are two of them). > (subinterpreters, perhaps, but they're going to have trouble anyway, > since they won't have access to the real main thread) Ah, subinterpreters :-) cheers Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4