On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 21:43:00 +0200 Victor Stinner <victor.stinner at gmail.com> wrote: > 2013/8/28 Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net>: > > I don't want to sound too demanding, but was this patch actually > > reviewed? I can't find a single review comment in > > http://bugs.python.org/issue18571 > > No, it was not. The first patch for the PEP 446 (issue #18571) was > available for a review approximatively one month ago. The > implementation of the PEP 433 is very close and the issue #17036 had > patches since january. > > I tested my implementation on many different platforms, I didn't see > any regression. > > You can still review the commit and modify directly the source code if > you would like to change something. You can also use python-dev@ > mailing list if you have comments or questions. Well, reviewing a 1500-line commit is not very doable. Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4