Le Mon, 26 Aug 2013 09:14:38 -0700, Eli Bendersky <eliben at gmail.com> a écrit : > > Antoine, you opted out of the tracker issue but I feel it's fair to > let you know that after a lot of discussion with Nick and Stefan (*), > we've settled on renaming the input methods to feed & close, and the > output method to read_events. We are also considering a different > name for the class. Fair enough. > As for the class name, IncrementalParser is ambiguous because it's not > immediately clear which side is incremental. Input or output? Both are :-) (which makes sense, really: an incremental input without output will only yield a slight memory consumption benefit - only slight, since the object tree representation should be much more costly than its bytes serialization -; an incremental output without input doesn't seem to have any point at all) Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4