RetroSearch Browse

Sat Aug 24 16:13:34 CEST 2013 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-August/128112.html

On Sun, 25 Aug 2013 00:03:01 +1000
Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
> If Stefan's "please revert this" as lxml.etree maintainer isn't
> enough, then I'm happy to add a "please revert this" as a core
> committer that is confused about how and when the new tulip-inspired
> incremental parsing API should be used in preference to the existing
> incremental parsing API, and believes this needs to be clearly
> resolved before adding a second way to do it
> (especially if there's a
> possibility of using a different implementation strategy that avoids
> adding the second way).

To be clear, again: anyone who wants to "see it resolved" can take over
the issue and handle it by themselves. I'm done with it.

Regards

Antoine.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-August/128112.html below:

[Python-Dev] please back out changeset f903cf864191 before alpha-2