On Sat, 24 Aug 2013 14:53:13 +0200, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: > On Sat, 24 Aug 2013 14:46:32 +0200 > Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml at behnel.de> wrote: > > > > As I said, the only reason why the current implementation is there is > > "because it's there". > > No. It works, it's functional, it fills an use case, and it doesn't seem > to have any concrete issues. > > Get over it, Stefan, and stop trolling us. Stefan is not trolling. He's raising objections that you disagree with. It costs nothing to keep the discussion civil. --David
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4