On 8/14/2013 9:27 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > > I think Eric is overinterpreting the spec, there. While that > particular sentence requires that the empty format string will be > equivalent to a plain str() operation for builtin types, it is only a > recommendation for other types. For enums, I believe they should be > formatted like their base types (so !s and !r will show the enum name, > anything without coercion will show the value) . > > Cheers, > Nick. > I could agree with the above for IntEnum, but Enum doesn't have a "base type", it has a contained type, no? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20130814/a969403d/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4