On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Chris Angelico <rosuav at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > > That would be PEP 4 :) > > What's the normal way to update a PEP? > > """"... proposals for deprecating modules MUST be made by providing a > change to the text of this PEP, which SHOULD be a patch posted to > SourceForge...""" > > Would that now be more accurately done as a Mercurial patch, or a tracker > issue? > Email here with proposed changes and/or email to PEP editors (skip python-dev if it's a simple typo fix). -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20130814/ee891b00/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4