Le Fri, 09 Aug 2013 13:11:11 +0200, Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml at behnel.de> a écrit : > > I attached it to the ticket that seems to have been the source of this > addition. > > http://bugs.python.org/issue17741 > > Please note that the tulip mailing list is not an appropriate place to > discuss additions to the XML libraries, and ElementTree in particular. Well, the bug tracker is the main point of discussion, except that few people bothered discussing it. > Is there a way to get automatic notification when the XML component is > assigned to a ticket? (Not that it would have helped in this case, as > the component was missing from the ticket.) You could ask to get included in the "experts" index: http://docs.python.org/devguide/experts.html (I doubt anyone would object to that) > Anyway, given that there isn't really the One Obvious Way to do it, > maybe you should just add a docstring to the class (ahem), reference > the stream protocol as the base for its API, and then rename it to > IncrementalStreamParser. I don't think there's any point in making the class name longer. Parsing XML incrementally is pretty much what it does. As for the docstring, uh, well, sure :-) (IMHO, IncrementalParser is the One Obvious Way to do incremental XML parsing in 3.4, but YMMV) Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4