On 04/29/2013 02:45 PM, Terry Jan Reedy wrote: > On 4/29/2013 8:24 AM, Eli Bendersky wrote: > >> Thanks for the summary. One issue I don't see addressed here is >> int-compatibility. Am I correct to assume that nothing changes w.r.t. >> that, and that an IntEnum subclass of Enum will be provided which is >> isinstance(integer)? Does that become straightforward by nature of enum >> values being the type of their enumerations? > > My only concern is that whatever you do does not break transitivity of ==. Aside from that, I will be happy with > whatever you end up with and use it as appropriate. It will not be broken. -- ~Ethan~
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4