On 4/29/2013 8:24 AM, Eli Bendersky wrote: > Thanks for the summary. One issue I don't see addressed here is > int-compatibility. Am I correct to assume that nothing changes w.r.t. > that, and that an IntEnum subclass of Enum will be provided which is > isinstance(integer)? Does that become straightforward by nature of enum > values being the type of their enumerations? My only concern is that whatever you do does not break transitivity of ==. Aside from that, I will be happy with whatever you end up with and use it as appropriate.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4