On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 1:09 AM, Ethan Furman <ethan at stoneleaf.us> wrote: > We just fixed NoneType() to return None instead of raising an exception. > > Another use-case for calling NoneType is working with ORMs: > > result = [] > for field in row: > type = get_type(field) # returns int, bool, str, NoneType, ... > result.append(type(field)) Having it return NoneType there seems a strange thing to do, as have a None field makes no sense. Why would you have a column that can only contain the value None? What is returning NoneType at that point supposed to signify? If it's supposed to signify that the value is NULL, I think the above code is a very strange way of handling that. get_type(field) should reasonably return the type of the column, not the type of the value you got, as that would be just type(field) and doing type(field)(field) is a bit pointless. :-) //Lennart
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4