On 4 Apr 2013 14:58, "Eric Snow" <ericsnowcurrently at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 6:47 AM, Hrvoje Niksic <hrvoje.niksic at avl.com> wrote: > > It seems like a good feature that an __int__ implementation can choose to > > return an int subclass with additional (and optional) information. After > > all, int subclass instances should be usable everywhere where ints are, > > including in C code. > > Unless you want to try to use the concrete C-API in CPython. In my > experience the concrete API is not very subclass friendly. Using it with subclasses is an outright bug (except as part of a subclass implementation). Cheers, Nick. > > -eric > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ncoghlan%40gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20130404/a1347fd3/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4