On 2012-09-30, at 15:15 , Antoine Pitrou wrote: > On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 15:10:06 +0200 > Dirkjan Ochtman <dirkjan at ochtman.nl> wrote: >> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: >>> Can't we simply include the Olson database in Windows installers? >> >> We probably can, but the problem is that it's updated quite often (for >> example, in 2011, there were about 14 releases; in 2009, there were >> 21). So you'd want to have a mechanism to override the data that is >> included in the stdlib. > > Probably, but for most purposes I would guess a 2-year old database is > still good enough? After all, you don't see many people complaining > about the outdated Unicode database that is hard-wired in past Pythons. But at worst, an outdated unicode database will be missing data right? Doesn't an outdated timezone db have the risk of returning *incorrect* data?
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4