On 29 September 2012 06:51, Paul Moore <p.f.moore at gmail.com> wrote: > > Wow! I had no idea cdecimal was that close in speed to float. That's > seriously impressive. > If those numbers are similar in other benchmarks, would it be accurate and/or reasonable to include a statement along the lines of: "comparable to float performance - usually no more than 3x for calculations within the range of numbers covered by float" or is there not enough evidence to conclude that? Substitute suitable factor for 3x. Obviously -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20120929/26e14a3c/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4