RetroSearch Browse

Mon Sep 24 18:59:43 CEST 2012 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-September/121810.html

+1 for 3.4

And I'll be available to help with HTTP(websockets and SPDY) related stuff!

2012/9/24 Senthil Kumaran <senthil at uthcode.com>

> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Christian Heimes <christian at python.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 for 3.4
> >
> > You proposed gave me another idea. What do you think about SPDY support
> > in the stdlib? It's the next step after HTTP 1.1.
>
> Yeah, it is a good idea. it should live along side with HTTP 1.1 as
> another protocol layer.
> Guido had given some suggestions to takle that, but I have been lazing
> and lagging for while now in terms of contributions, but I am excited
> about the idea.
>
> --
> Senthil
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/felipecruz%40loogica.net
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20120924/58e3a766/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-September/121810.html below:

[Python-Dev] Better HTTP 1.1 support in http.server?