On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 9:56 PM, Mark Dickinson <dickinsm at gmail.com> wrote: > I submit that the word 'positional' in the TypeError message > exacerbates this confusion, and that little would be lost by simply > dropping it from the exception message. +1 for using the unqualified "argument" in these error messages to mean "positional or keyword argument" (inspect.Parameter spells it out as POSITIONAL_OR_KEYWORD, but the full phrase is far too verbose for an error message). Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4