> I agree with Lennart's and Antoine's advice of just move forward with what > we have. If some PEPs need fixing then let's fix them, but we don't need to > rock the horse even more by going overboard. Getting the sane, core bits > into the stdlib as packaging is meant to is plenty to take on. If people > want to reinvent stuff they can do it elsewhere. I personally don't care if > it is done inside or outside the stdlib initially or if it stays in > packaging or goes directly into distutils, but forward movement with what we > have is the most important thing. +100 I was excited about packaging in 2010, it is time to document and implement the specs we have. The sooner we do, the less confusing it will be for a newcomer who just wants to release a simple printer of nested lists to pypi.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4