A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-September/121720.html below:

[Python-Dev] packaging location ?

[Python-Dev] packaging location ?Tarek Ziadé tarek at ziade.org
Thu Sep 13 15:15:19 CEST 2012
On 9/13/12 2:45 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
>> 4. ask each project to pour in pkglib anything that can be reused by others
> +1, although again it'll be down to the projects whether they do
> actually contribute. Also this somewhat contradicts the "be strict"
> point above, which is why I'm lukewarm on "be strict". Practicality vs
> purity - getting contributors/users is more important than insisting
> that everything be standardised before it can be implemented.

Let me take back 'strict process' and replace it with:

Everything added in pkglib should be a basic feature/implementation that 
does not force the tools to change the
way *they* see their build/release/UI processes.

The most sophisticated feature I am thinking about is the set of apis in 
distutils2.pypi
They are APIs to browse and interact with PyPI, and they are useful to 
many projects,  so I think it fits my definition.

otho, anything relating to compilation should not be added there, unless 
it's APIs to get some aggregated info,
like on the top of platform/sys/etc


Cheers
Tarek
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4