On Sep 11, 2012, at 09:30 PM, Chris Jerdonek wrote: >I didn't have time to respond Barry's e-mail from four hours ago >before this was committed. I think this change may be problematic. >At the least, I think people should have an opportunity to air their >specific concerns and talk through the implications. > >Also, from the discussion it seemed like the sentiment was leaning >towards a different approach for the fix. > >I made a comment on the issue with some more extended remarks: > >http://bugs.python.org/msg170351 The alternative suggested fix breaks the test suite (yes I tried it). So maybe we have to go back and decide whether the original fix for #12776 and #11839 is correct. More detail in the tracker issue. -Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4