Am 08.09.2012 11:35, schrieb Stefan Krah: > That sounds good in principle. I'm only worried that for casual readers > of either the commit messages or the tracker issues the importance of > the Coverity tool might be overstated. > > After all, 99.99% of issues are either found by developers themselves or > by gcc, Visual Studio, Valgrind, etc. It just occurred to me that for example > we don't credit other tools in commit messages. I'd like to avoid that two people create two bug tracker entries or work on the same issue at the same time. The CID (coverity id) also makes it easier to find the entry on the Coverity site. IMHO it's sufficient to mention the CID in the tracker entry. As Brett has said it's also nice to give credits, too. By the way I've automated the build and upload process. Every six hours the default branch is pulled from hg and a build is triggere when changes are detected. Christian
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4