RetroSearch Browse

Sat Sep 8 16:56:46 CEST 2012 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-September/121627.html

On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Stefan Krah <stefan at bytereef.org> wrote:
> Petri Lehtinen <petri at digip.org> wrote:
>> > ("715365") does not exist.
>>
>> Is this related to the Coverity ID being mentioned in
>> http://bugs.python.org/issue15868 ?
>
> Must be. I used the pattern #<number> twice in the commit message:
>
> http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/df663603e67a

No, using the pattern number twice is OK now - it's using it for an
issue that *doesn't exist* that broke.

Better to just not use that notation for the Coverity ID's by writing
"CID 715365" or something similar so we don't get any false hits on
the tracker integration.

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-September/121627.html below:

[Python-Dev] Failed issue tracker submission