Am 28.10.2012 17:23, schrieb Mark Lawrence: > On 28/10/2012 12:39, Georg Brandl wrote: >> Am 28.10.2012 13:30, schrieb Antoine Pitrou: >>> On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 05:19:26 -0700 >>> Chris Jerdonek <chris.jerdonek at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> One reason to change would be to avoid possible confusion created on >>>> pages like this-- >>>> >>>> http://docs.python.org/3.3/whatsnew/3.2.html >>>> >>>> where it says-- >>>> >>>> Author: Raymond Hettinger >>>> Release: 3.3.0 >>>> Date: October 27, 2012 >>>> >>>> Would there be any disadvantage to changing the in-development titles >>>> to read something like 3.3.0+, etc? >>> >>> Well, first why does it mention 3.3.0 while it's the what's new for >>> 3.2? That's totally confusing, this mention should simply be removed. >>> Also the date is not informative at all. >> >> Agreed, I've now removed them. >> >> Georg >> > > Is it worth removing this as well, it's a couple of lines down > > "See also PEP 392 - Python 3.2 Release Schedule" ? Why? PEP 392 is not out of date, and for those who want to know when exactly 3.2 and its minor versions were released, it is useful. Georg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4