RetroSearch Browse

Sun Oct 28 13:54:47 CET 2012 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-October/122467.html

On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 5:39 AM, Georg Brandl <g.brandl at gmx.net> wrote:
> Am 28.10.2012 13:30, schrieb Antoine Pitrou:
>> Well, first why does it mention 3.3.0 while it's the what's new for
>> 3.2? That's totally confusing, this mention should simply be removed.
>> Also the date is not informative at all.
>
> Agreed, I've now removed them.

Thanks a lot.  Many of the index pages linked from the table of
contents also have uninformative release and date lines, e.g.

http://docs.python.org/3/library/index.html

but they use ":Release: |version|" (minor version without micro
version) instead of ":Release: |release|", so they're less likely to
be construed as an actual release date (but still uninformative).

--Chris

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-October/122467.html below:

[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: PEP for updating the URL layout on docs.python.org