On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 4:34 AM, Georg Brandl <g.brandl at gmx.net> wrote: > Am 28.10.2012 12:29, schrieb Chris Jerdonek: > ... > I understand "latest" to mean "latest stable plus bugfixes". > I.e., /3/ is 3.3.0+. /dev and /3.4 is 3.4a0. It might need clarifying > in the PEP. > ... >> There's a slight mismatch with how we're doing it today because >> "http://docs.python.org/3/" shows 3.3.0 in the title even though it's >> the in-progress 3.3.1. The title should perhaps reflect that it's >> post 3.3.0 (and similarly for the 2.7 and 3.2 pages). > > Well, that has always been the case, and it doesn't matter anyway, because > generally there's nothing in 3.3.1, feature-wise, that won't have been in 3.3.0. One reason to change would be to avoid possible confusion created on pages like this-- http://docs.python.org/3.3/whatsnew/3.2.html where it says-- Author: Raymond Hettinger Release: 3.3.0 Date: October 27, 2012 Would there be any disadvantage to changing the in-development titles to read something like 3.3.0+, etc? --Chris
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4