Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-October/122430.html below:

[Python-Dev] Python 3.3 vs. Python 2.7 benchmark results (again, but this time more solid numbers)

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Python 3.3 vs. Python 2.7 benchmark results (again, but this time more solid numbers)
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Python 3.3 vs. Python 2.7 benchmark results (again, but this time more solid numbers)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 15:14:08 -0400
Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote:
> 
> Worst benchmark is nosite_startup, best is telco. The benchmarks people
> might want to analyze (i.e. more than 20% slower in Python 3.3) are
> mako_v2, threaded_count, normal_startup, iterative_count, pathlib,
> formatted_logging, and simple_logging.

Well, did you check that mako_v2 wasn't subject to the Markupsafe
issue?

threaded_count and iterative_count are completely dumb.
Slower startup is due to the fact that Python 3 needs many more
modules to even start itself.

Regards

Antoine.

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Python 3.3 vs. Python 2.7 benchmark results (again, but this time more solid numbers)
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Python 3.3 vs. Python 2.7 benchmark results (again, but this time more solid numbers)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4