RetroSearch Browse

Fri Oct 19 16:30:25 CEST 2012 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-October/122248.html

On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 12:14 AM, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote:
> On Oct 19, 2012, at 09:33 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
>>At the moment, with the "3.4" used throughout the examples in both
>>PEPs, it's a little confusing w.r.t the actual 3.4 release PEP. I
>>could live with "Deferred" instead of "Rejected", but one or the other
>>should happen.
>
> I no longer have much interest (or frankly, time) to pursue PEP 407.  Deferred
> seems about right to me.

Done - I marked them both as Deferred. If anyone is interested in
doing so, we can pick them up again in a year or two, as I expect this
isn't a question that will go away any time soon :)

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-October/122248.html below:

[Python-Dev] Rejecting PEPs 407 and 413?