A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-October/122212.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 426 comment: field order

[Python-Dev] PEP 426 comment: field order [Python-Dev] PEP 426 comment: field ordermartin at v.loewis.de martin at v.loewis.de
Thu Oct 18 20:45:44 CEST 2012
I'd like to request that PEP 426 is extended to talk about the order  
of fields.
In particular, for the Extension field, is it necessary that all  
"additional tags"
follow immediately the respective Extension field?

I also request that RFC 2119 terminology is followed strictly. In particular,
the phrasing "Additional tags defined by the extension should be of  
the form string/Name:"
is unclear - under what "particular circumstances" can I deviate from that
requirement, i.e. use some form other than string/Name?

Regards,
Martin


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4